RESUMO
Social anxiety may disrupt the empathic process, and well-regulated empathy is critical for navigating the social world. Two studies aimed to further understand empathy in the context of social anxiety. Study 1 compared individuals with elevated or normative social anxiety on a measure assessing cognitive and affective empathy for positive and negative emotions conveyed by other people ("targets"), completed under social threat. Relative to individuals with normative social anxiety, individuals with elevated social anxiety had greater cognitive empathy and no differences in affective empathy, regardless of emotion type. As greater cognitive empathy can be maladaptive, Study 2 tested whether this could be down-regulated. Individuals with elevated social anxiety underwent emotional working memory training (eWMT) for negative emotional information, or control training (CT). Effects on an empathy measure completed under social threat were assessed. Cognitive empathy for negative emotions decreased following eWMT but not CT, and this was only evident for those with higher pre-training working memory capacity. Cognitive empathy for positive emotions and affective empathy were not affected. Overall, social anxiety is associated with aberrant elevated cognitive empathy for negative and positive emotions, and the deviation in cognitive empathy for negative emotions can be regulated with eWMT for certain individuals.Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry identifier: ACTRN12618001196235..
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have examined the relationship between executive functions and performance on cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) tasks, such as cognitive restructuring. However, previous studies have used samples of older adults and only traditional measures of executive functions involving non-emotional stimuli. This study extends previous research to examine the specific executive function of shifting with regard to non-emotional and emotional stimuli and its relationship with cognitive restructuring, in a sample of young to middle-aged adults with elevated social anxiety. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Participants (N = 49) completed a standard Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), an emotional version of the WCST (eWCST), and a cognitive restructuring task prior to an impromptu speech task. Per cent perseverative errors (an indicator of shifting) from the WCST and eWCST, along with planned covariates, were used to predict three indicators of cognitive restructuring task performance: task response quality (production of helpful alternative thoughts), change in belief in negative thought, and peak anxiety during speech. RESULTS: As expected, higher per cent perseverative errors (i.e., poorer shifting) on the WCST predicted poorer ability during the cognitive restructuring task to produce helpful alternative thoughts to a negative thought about the impending speech task. However, WCST per cent perseverative errors did not predict the other indicators of cognitive restructuring task performance. eWCST per cent perseverative errors did not predict any of the indicators of cognitive restructuring task performance. CONCLUSIONS: The standard WCST may be sensitive to capturing the type of mental flexibility which is important for producing helpful alternative thinking during cognitive restructuring. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Poorer shifting ability with regard to non-emotional stimuli in clients with elevated social anxiety may be related to poorer ability to produce helpful alternative thoughts during cognitive restructuring. For clinicians whose clients with elevated social anxiety are having difficulty with generating alternative thoughts during cognitive restructuring, clinicians should consider poor shifting ability as a potential contributing factor. Clinicians may need to provide further support for such clients during cognitive restructuring (e.g., greater emphasis on Socratic questioning to better facilitate alternative thinking).
